Corporate Structures and Groups

a journal devoted to the tax aspects of structuring and restructuring corporations and other business entities

 
Volume IX, No. 1 2004
Highlights

SERIES OF TRANSACTIONS

Federal Court of Appeal Expands Scope of Series of Transactions: A Review of Canadian Utilities v. The Queen
Mark D. Brender
Mark Brender reviews the decision of Canadian Utilities Limited et al. v. The Queen, in which the Federal Court of Appeal examined the question of what constitutes a common law series in the context of a structured disposition designed to benefit from the Part IV tax exception to subsection 55(2) of the Income Tax Act. The taxpayers had engaged in a capital gains strip transaction, following which they paid normal course dividends giving rise to Part IV tax refunds. The Court had to determine whether the normal course dividends formed part of the same series of transactions that included the capital gains strip transaction to which subsection 55(2) would otherwise apply. Justice Rothstein rejected the view espoused by the Tax Court of Canada, which had held that an independent transaction can never form part of a common law series, and reinforces the notion that, for a series to exist, the subsequent transaction must be determined at the time the initial transaction is completed – whether or not it has an independent purpose.

TAX DEFERRALS

Return of Capital of a Public Corporation: Amendments to Subsection 84(4.1)
Gabrielle M.R. Richards
Generally, a public corporation is able to return paid-up capital to its shareholders on a tax-free basis only if the reduction of paid-up capital arises on (i) a redemption, acquisition or cancellation of shares of a class; (ii) a transaction described in subsection 84(2); or (iii) a transaction described in section 86. As a consequence of the rules in subsection 84(4.1), the exception in (i) was unavailable and public companies wishing to return capital had to rely on the exceptions in (ii) or (iii). Following the issuance of several comfort letters by the Department of Finance, proposed amendments were published on February 27, 2004. Gabrielle Richards discusses the amendments and their effects.

FOREIGN SPIN-OFFS

Morasse v. The Queen – Mexican Pegs in Canadian Holes?
Christopher J. Steeves

 

Board

Mark D. Brender
Editor-in-Chief
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP
Montreal

Serge Bilodeau
KPMG LLP
Montreal

Greg C. Boehmer
Ernst & Young LLP
Toronto

K.A. Siobhan Monaghan
Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP
Toronto

Gabrielle M.R. Richards
McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Toronto

Christopher J. Steeves
Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP
Toronto

Marc N. Ton-That
KPMG LLP
Toronto

David M. Williamson
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Calgary