International Tax Planning

a journal devoted to the international aspects of tax planning

 
Volume XII, No. 3 2004
Highlights

CROSS-BORDER FINANCE

Hybrid Entities and Dually-chartered Entities – International Tax Developments
Richard Tremblay, Matias Milet
Richard Tremblay and Matias Milet examine the potential impact of three international tax developments on outbound and inbound cross-border financing structures that utilize entities that are treated as conduits in one jurisdiction and as corporations in another: (i) the Canada Revenue Agency's signalling in a recent view that it may adopt an OECD commentary position denying treaty benefits to certain hybrid entities; (ii) the proposed amendment to the U.S.-Canada income tax treaty that would make companies that are chartered in both the U.S. and Canada dual residents for treaty purposes; and (iii) proposed U.S. regulations dealing with entities chartered in both the U.S. and another jurisdiction. The authors note that development (i) would have a major impact on certain inbound financing structures, while developments (ii) and (iii) generally should not affect hybrid entity cross-border financings.

FINANCING STRUCTURES

Polish-based Financing Structure to Finance U.S. Subsidiaries of Canadian Multinationals
Penny Woolford
Penny Woolford examines the consequences of recent tax law changes in Hungary and the current renegotiation of the Hungary-U.S. tax treaty that could cause a Hungarian-based financing structure used to finance businesses in the United States to be ineligible for the treaty benefits it currently enjoys. The Hungarian Offshore Company ("HOC") regime is being dismantled and these entities will be subject to regular Hungarian corporate tax after 2005. In addition, the new treaty with the U.S. will probably include a modern limitation on benefits ("LOB") article that could result in a 30% withholding tax on interest payments to (former) HOCs. Poland is an attractive alternative to Hungary for financing into the U.S. because its treaty with the U.S. provides for 0% withholding tax on related party interest, does not contain an LOB article, and is currently not under renegotiation.

U.S. WITHHOLDING TAX

U.S. Withholding Tax Developments Since 2001
Mark Mitchell
Mark Mitchell summarizes changes in U.S. withholding taxes since 2001, including developments in partnership withholding tax under section 1446 of the Internal Revenue Code, withholding on real property dispositions under section 1445, issues relating to obtaining taxpayer identification numbers from the Internal Revenue Service and changes relevant to financial institutions acting as "qualified intermediaries" under section 1441. The author explains that the changes, while not major, can have a significant impact on Canadians with cross-border investments.

 

Board

Richard G. Tremblay
Editor-in-Chief
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP

Gabriel J. Hayos
KPMG LLP

Edward A. Heakes
Macleod Dixon

Michael J. Maikawa
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

C. Andrew McAskile
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Joel A. Nitikman
Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP

Michael J. O’Keefe
Thorsteinssons

James M. Parks
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP

Shawn D. Porter
Deloitte & Touche LLP